Letter to Singapore Ministry of Law, Ministry of Home Affairs, Supreme Court, and so on
Dear MiniLaw, MiniHA, SupCourt, and so on…
[1] It is the second anniversary of HC/S 413/2021, where the inherent powers of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Singapore were used to support illegal activity at Nanyang Technological University-Imperial College London Lee Kong Chian School of medicine, and elsewhere.
[2] However, more pressing concerns come to our attention, as follows.
[3] Regarding the Ideal Rules of Court 2021 and which were announced under Intellectual Property Law on 23 February 2022, and which came into effect on April Fool’s Day of 2022 – why so quiet leh? Even Pinsler kept mum, until he surprised us all with a black book, lock stock and stinking barrell shot shortly after said April Fool’s Day?
[4] Why is there not a single person listed under LAWNET TECHNOLOGY SERVICES Product Management Digital Transformation? Must be because that is all outsourced to CrimsonLogic? But then, why is information to the public on CrimsonLogic still following the old Rules of Court? Where is the Digital Transformation to realize the belated and much-parroted Ideals?
[5] About the Keppel scandal, or the most expensive corruption case in history – seriously? Not a peep? Pop even?
[6] And what about the perjury on record at SupCourt? Also quiet can?
[7] If we circle back to HC/S 413/2021, I might have understood something many of you exclaimed to me in that regard: ‘But you’re not Singaporean!’
I would have liked to ask: Are you?
[8] In light of the above, I have reason to believe the more urgent question is:
Are you human?
[9] Tuck yourself in bed with whatever share of money flowing you can take in. Sweet dreams.
Mohamed Helmy
MD, PhD
Litigant in non-person
P.S. Kenny, sorry I did not leave ‘your chambers’ as quickly as you wanted me to. I mean, ‘Even if Timothy Ang and Wilson Zhu (Rajah & Tann) have no warrant to act, and even if the Affidavit by Goh is forged, I would still strike out your case.’ – where was I supposed to go with that?
P.P.S. Where is Madame Lee-Khoo Poh Choo? Please pass this to her: Sorry I did not leave Chamber 2-12 as quickly as you wanted me to, when you told me. Or squealed rather, you did sound so aggravated. In any case, I am certain, that with your just ability to look at one monitor and one monitor only at a time, that you have had many opportunities for satisfaction, both in Chamber 2-12 as well as in your private residence from which you zoomed in many ways.
P.P.P.S. Eunice Chan Swee En, I see your choice of footwear may have led you away from government coffers. With your straight-face lying skills, I am sure you may spread your charm privately successfully.
P.P.P.P.S. And Shadrake's Once A Jolly Hangman...well we don't talk about that.
